Posts Tagged ‘President’s Management Council’

Status of Political Appointments: June 2009

June 17, 2009

People have been asking me why I’m still doing a transition blog:  “Isn’t the transition over?”  Well, no.

It’s five months into the Obama Administration and according to the Washington Post’s Head Count, only 23 percent (146) of the top 492 jobs have been filled.  There’s yet to be an orientation of new incoming appointees, either.  Just last week GSA identified the Hay Group to organize and run the orientation.  This may not have been on the fast track in part because there wasn’t a critical mass of appointees in place to orient!  And the President’s Management Council – largely comprised of departmental deputy secretaries – hasn’t convened yet (to my knowledge) because there isn’t a quorum of deputy secretaries.

When visitors from foreign government come through our office asking about the transition progress of the new Obama Administration, I try to explain this to them.  They seem baffled.  How can the U.S. Government be fighting two wars, address a major economic crisis, pursue healthcare reform, combat climate change, and have less than a quarter of its top government executives in place?

I explain how Don Gips, the head of the president’s selection and appointment process, and his deputy, David Jacobson, have now both been selected for appointments as ambassadors.  These critical vacancies have the potential to slow the selection process.

I also explain how top level appointees need to be confirmed by the Senate.  I also share with them how this process isn’t always based on assessing the qualifications of the appointees, either.  For example, the hardcopy version of this week’s Federal Times notes that Senate floor votes on at least 25 nominees are being held up by some Republicans because they are miffed that the confirmation hearing for Supreme Court nominee Sonya Sotomayor is scheduled for mid-July, which is sooner than they would like.  This hold up includes positions such as the chief lawyer for the State Department, an undersecretary for Homeland Security, and I guess Jeff Zients as well, whose nomination was voted out of committee a few days ago.

I get a blank look from these foreign visitors.  I just shrug.  I can’t explain it either!  But they better understand why more power and authority is being centralized in the White House, where most appointees do not need to be confirmed.  There, positions have been filled quickly and they are able to move forward on the president’s agenda.

Advertisements

Inventory of Blog Entries

October 22, 2008

This is my 100th blog entry!  Thanks to our many readers and contributors.  While few people post comments on our entries, we get lots of emails and phone calls.  Also, thanks to the Library of Congress for asking to preserve the site as part of its 2008 election coverage.  It’s been fun.

 

I looked back to see if there were any themes to all the stuff I’ve been writing and thought this would be a good point to come up with a rough index, which I’ll periodically update:

 

 (Last Updated: December 23, 2008)

 

Blogs on “The Big Picture” — Where Is Government Reform Going?

Blogs on What the Campaigns Have Been Saying About Government Reform

 

Blogs on the History of Transitions

 

Blogs on the 2008 Transition Process

 Blogs on The Bush Administration’s Transition-Out Activities

 Blogs on Management Ideas for the Next Administration

 Blogs on Advice for the New Team

Blogs on What Other Groups Are Doing

 

I’ll expand this list over time, so you might want to bookmark this page and return to it when you might be looking for something particular.

 

Also, I’m getting so much stuff, I’ll start blogging more frequently, with shorter blogs.  Would like to see how that works for you. Let me know. 

Agency Transition Efforts

July 14, 2008
Department of Labor

Department of Labor

There are some stirring in different agencies with regard to preparation for the transition.

Department of Labor

Last week I had the opportunity to participate in the Department of Labor’s annual conference of its entire senior executive corps. A large chunk of the meeting focused on the upcoming presidential transition and how it might affect the work of the Department. About two-thirds of the Department’s career senior executives are new to their roles since the last transition in 2000. So there was a lot of interest in the topic!

I was invited to provide an overview of the four stages of the transition process and provide some insights as to the potential effects of the transition on the department, its programs, and for career executives. The interesting part, though, was a panel of seasoned senior executives from the Department, some of who noted that their first transition was between Presidents Nixon and Ford.

The panelists noted that every transition they had been through was different but they had some insights based on accumulated wisdom:

• Departing officials need to know what records they can take and what they must leave behind.

• Agency staff should be helpful to the post-election transition team but work through pre-determined channels that are defined by the outgoing administration and the incoming transition teams. A note of caution was offered. Because the post-election transition team is likely not comprised of federal employees, agency staff cannot share certain documents. If they share information, even informally, with the team about pre-decisional budget materials, pending lawsuits, etc., the government may be waiving its privilege to keep that information out of the public eye and it may be subject to public release of that information under the Freedom of Information Act. This could jeopardize law enforcement actions, or other normally confidential proceedings.

• The Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998 defined the issue of “who’s in charge” during the transition. The incoming president can appoint an official to be in charge in an “acting” capacity at least temporarily, but absent that, the highest-ranking career official will temporarily hold the job, but not necessarily in an “acting” capacity. Most agencies define an order of succession before the transition occurs. In Labor, one political appointee was left behind from the Clinton Administration until President Bush’s Secretary of Labor was confirmed, then that person resigned.

• Field staff tends to feel some anxiety about what is happening during the transition in Washington. The panelists’ advice was: continue doing their job, and continue applying the law (e.g., in enforcement actions) but keep the new team apprised of what is going on.

• The panelists encouraged their fellow senior executives to make an extra effort to communicate with field staff during the transition – share what they know about what the new team is asking questions about, describe any changes to the decision-making process, and fix any web pages with the names of recently departed officials!

• The panelists observed that there will be a period where trust between the new political appointees and the career executives will have to be re-built. They mentioned the 120-day “getting to know you” period where new politicals cannot move a career executive to a different position involuntarily.

• They noted that they should all be ready to answer a lot of questions that start with “Why?”

Assistant Secretary Patrick Pizzella offered that the Department was in the process of establishing an internal transition team in accordance with guidance from the President’s Management Council. This process will define briefing book formats, etc., but will also determine which career executives will provide leadership during the transition period. The goal is to ensure a smooth transition – and when the new team asks for information, the answer isn’t “this hasn’t been updated in a few years.”

One of the senior executives, Shelby Hallmark, shared an interesting insight with his peers: that for the career senior executives, “the transition is our largest opportunity to serve.” He observed that mid-level managers, especially those new to government, who have never been through a presidential transition, will turn to their senior executives for guidance on how to engage the new leadership. It’s a period when the career executives become the cross-roads for information and they need to be especially mindful of this during the transition period.

What’s going on in other agencies in regard to preparation for the transition?

• The Washington Post had a story about the Justice Department’s commitments yesterday.

Federal Times is interested in knowing as well. It dedicated a webpage to tracking what is happening at the agency level. There haven’t been any posts to the page so far, though.

• There has been a lot of congressional interest, beyond the homeland security arena where Congress has already required transition planning in law. Several agencies have received congressional inquiries asking for copies of transition plans. A Senate committee plans to hold a hearing in the next few weeks to quiz the Administration on its broader plans.

• I understand that the President’s Management Council and the Office of Management and Budget are putting the final touches on a government-wide guidance memo that will be going out shortly. No scorecard, though!